Unit 4 Ip

Unit 4 IP Date February 3, 2013 1. What both policies could you use to reduce the total heart and soul of emissions? The first policy that I would put in describe is a reduction of hours available for the plants to run. I think that by reducing the available operation times, you will arouse less(prenominal) production and therefore less pollution. This will ultimately stuff the company who definitely needs all the time they can to become their products, to find a cleaner substance to get the job done. The indorsement policy that I would put in place would be a defineation on the amount of true chemicals that can be used.I would limit the use of chemicals that cause the most emissions problems and invoke fines on anyone who goes over the limit usage. This would 2. Why do you think they apiece would work? As I mentioned above, the first policy would force the company to find a split up way to produce power without the dangers of the externalities polluting the air. The com pany will need to break down at a certain level to produce power, so they would consume no other choice but to find a way to reduce emissions. With the second policy would only work if there were fines associated with using more than the allotted amount of chemicals that cause pollution.We could have policies all solar day long, but if there are no consequences or they dont have anyone to answer to then things will not change. They will get across to produce at levels that are dangerous to the people around them. 3. What would the benefits of each action be (besides emissions reduction)? In addition to the reduction of emissions, we would also recognise control of the quality of energy being produced. There would be a consistent product that was produced cleanly and it definitely would be better for the health of the people that live around the power plants.The health benefits are less illnesses such as cancer, upper respiratory infections, and skin diseases associated with the release of externalities. 4. What would the be of each action be? With the first policy if it is put into place the power plant is definitely going to lose money. If we limit the amount of hours of production, they will definitely not be able to meet any(prenominal) quotas they have already put in place. They will produce less and this could affect their bottom line. With the second policy, it may cost them a critical more to put into place different procedures to measure the amount of certain chemicals released into the air.It wont be cheeseparingly as costly as reduced hours would be, but the minimal cost would definitely be expenditure it. 5. How would you decide what was the best level of emission reduction? I would desexualize what levels of certain chemicals are safe for the neighborhood through testing and with inquiry that has already been done. There are already studies on what is safe and what could abuse a population of people or animals that are located near a power plant. References Power Plant Pollution Control. (n. d. ). Engineering service Outsourcing. Retrieved February 4, 2013, from http//www. engineeringservicesoutsourcing